custom solutions and consulting beyond the obvious
»»»

Why Process Management Organizations Matter

»»»

Why Process Management Organizations Matter More Than a Tool

In 2016, a European car manufacturer faced a significant challenge: software and system development had to be brought back in-house after years of outsourcing to suppliers. Stricter EU regulations and increased liability risks prompted this decision.

The rationale was sound: in-house processes allow better control, quicker reactions to problems, and higher quality. However, the reality was different. Years of outsourcing had left internal processes outdated, unstructured, and often contradictory.

A modern process management tool was expected to solve these issues – but it quickly became apparent:
A tool alone cannot solve process problems. Without a functioning process management organization, even the best software has its limits.

The Starting Point: A Process Jungle

An initial analysis, conducted as part of a process improvement project, revealed significant shortcomings:

  • Existing process documentation was inconsistent and lacked structure.
  • Responsibilities were unclear, and there was no overarching framework.
  • New developers struggled to navigate the processes.

Multiple tools and data sources existed in parallel, further complicating the situation. While introducing a new tool seemed like the obvious solution, the root of the problem lay elsewhere.

The Real Challenge: The Process Management Organization

One of the key weaknesses was the lack of a structured process management organization. Here are the critical roles that are indispensable for effective process management:

  • Process Sponsor:

    • Responsible for the project’s strategic goals and budget.
    • Provides support and ensures prioritization.
  • Process Responsible:

    • Oversees processes on a company-wide level.
    • Establishes standards and ensures compliance.
  • Process Owner:

    • Accountable for the content of specific processes.
    • Works closely with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) who contribute technical knowledge.
  • Process Manager or Designer:

    • Ensures consistency and structure in process documentation.
    • Defines rules for reviews, approvals, and updates.
  • Process Architect:

    • Coordinates the overarching process landscape.
    • Prevents redundancies and ensures smooth integration between processes.
  • Process Users (Project Teams):

    • Use the processes in practice.
    • Supported by Process Coaches who provide guidance and ensure processes are effectively implemented.
  • Engineering Process Group (EPG):

    • Acts as the central decision-making body for process development.
    • Ensures harmonization and rapid decision-making.

 

Why the Organization Matters More Than the Tool

In this case, the lack of clarity around roles and responsibilities turned out to be the root cause of most issues. While a modern process management tool improved documentation and structure, it couldn’t address these fundamental problems:

  • Isolated, Siloed Workflows:
    SMEs worked independently, resulting in redundant and inconsistent processes.
  • Weak Decision-Making Structures:
    The EPG lacked authority, delaying or preventing critical decisions.
  • Inefficient Communication:
    Without clear communication channels, misunderstandings and inefficiencies became common.

Key Lesson: Process Management Starts with People

A well-organized process management structure is the foundation of any successful process improvement project. While tools can enhance efficiency, they are only as effective as the organization behind them:

  1. Clear Responsibilities:
    Every role must be clearly defined and empowered to fulfill its responsibilities.
  2. Effective Decision-Making:
    A strong EPG ensures that decisions are made and implemented promptly.
  3. Collaborative Processes:
    SMEs, process managers, and architects must work together to create a cohesive process landscape.

Conclusion: Striking the Right Balance

A process management tool can enhance efficiency, but it cannot replace a functioning organization. Clear roles, defined responsibilities, and effective communication are essential for success.

In this case, it took years to clean up the process landscape and make it usable. With a strong process management organization, this could have been achieved much faster and more cost-effectively.

»»»